The paper writing

The paper writing

This is why the Writing Center and your instructors encourage you to start writing more than a day before the paper is due. If you write the paper the night before it’s due, you make it almost impossible to read the paper with a fresh eye. Try outlining after writing—after you have a draft, look at each paragraph separately 4/12/ · I recently began writing a paper. I had a mass of stuff to work with. We’d analysed transcripts from a very large number of focus groups and sorted the material into large-ish themes and supporting sub-themes. And I could see that these themes spoke to a If you’re presenting an analysis of information, then your paper is analytical. If you’re writing to explain information, then your paper is expository. If you’re arguing a conclusion, then it’s argumentative or persuasive. Your thesis statement should match the type of paper you’re writing

Writing a Research Paper – The Writing Center – UW–Madison

One unavoidable, spelled out, take home message. There may be nuancing of the point, of course. Any more than one big point and your article is not only difficult to write, but also to read. Now, there are a load of planning strategies you can use to help sort out the point of your paper. Like the Tiny Text. Your argument just takes too many steps. You eventually get to the point, but it seems a very elongated and unnecessarily complicated process.

There is a the paper writing of foundational work you have to establish at the start before you can get into the meat of the paper. But maybe this is not you. If you are not a planner, but someone who sculpts a text from a tangled mass of free writing, you the paper writing still find yourself in the same messy situation, the paper writing.

You know the point you want to make, and the various pieces of the argument do fit together, but the whole thing the paper writing seems very unwieldy. The text is unduly complex. Not pleasing. You may also find yourself in the long paper twisty argument situation if you are writing from a PhD, the paper writing. Let me tell you about my paper writing problem to explain what I mean by two papers in one. I recently began writing a paper.

I had a mass of stuff to work with. And The paper writing could see that these themes spoke to a current interdisciplinary scholarly concern.

I could also see that they could say even more if they were subject to further theoretical work. It was a possible paper. Why not,I thought, put all of this together!

So I tried to construct an argument which said X is a current interdisciplinary scholarly concern and Z is current education policy. These seem to be much the same thing. But our research says A theorised through Y the point. A through Y the point not only suggests that X and Z are different, but that both X interdisciplinary scholarly concern and Z current education policy leave a bit to be desired. Now I am sure that you can see, as I spell this out, that this is just way too much to put in a paper.

It might in fact be the basis of a book if I added few more strands. But could I see that at first? I stayed mired in the morass I had created, bogged down for some weeks. Every day I did a bit on the unsatisfactory paper trying to whip it into shape. Multiple versions. Multiple days. No luck. Eventually, after a few days away from it, I took my own advice and asked myself whether this was actually two papers, one about X interdisciplinary scholarly concern and the other about Z policy.

The answer was yes. I could indeed prise X and Z apart. Although they had been conjoined in my thinking, it was possible to break them apart. Once X and Z were separated, I could see the shape and structure of two much clearer papers. And then I had a choice.

One for an interdisciplinary audience? Or one for my own field? Which was more important? What might add most to current thinking? Who did I really want to read the paper? In the end, the paper writing, the paper is about Z education policy. I want people in my field to have this paper — and I hope it might add to the conversations about policy The paper writing. I was the paper writing to see X interdisciplinary scholarly concern go.

But I could also see how this little dream had got in the way of writing something better, punchier, and tighter, about Z.

The paper is now much simpler. The argument moves are clear — We currently have policy Z, the paper writing. The research says A through Y. And A- Y suggests Z is misleading at best. So the point of this post is simply to say that if you find yourself, as I did, with a pretty complicated set of argument moves, juggling several bodies of literature and more than one big idea, it might be worth taking the risk and asking yourself:. Photo by Crawford Jolly on Unsplash, the paper writing.

Like Liked by 2 people. You are commenting using your WordPress. com account. You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account, the paper writing.

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. Email Address:. RSS - Posts. research education, academic writing, public engagement, funding, other eccentricities. Skip to content. Home about me my research my books contributions and comments talks and workshops. Share this: Twitter Facebook Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Print Email Reddit Pocket. Like this: Like Loading This entry was posted in argumentjournal articlethe point and tagged academic writingargumentjournal articlePat Thomsonthe point.

Bookmark the permalink. April 12, the paper writing, at am. I love this. I have felt like this. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:, the paper writing. Email required Address never made public. Name required. Search for:. patter on facebook. Patter by Pat Thomson is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.

Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at Patricia. Thomson nottingham. LOOKING FOR POSTS ON WRITING FOR JOURNALS? REVISING AND EDITING? GIVING FEEDBACK AND REVIEWING? abstracts academic blogging academic book academic writing argument authority in writing blogging blogging about blogging books book writing chapter co-writing conference conference papers conference presentation contribution crafting writing data doctoral research early career researchers editing ethics examiner feedback introduction journal journal article literature mapping literature review literature reviews literature themes methods chapter peer review PhD publishing reader reading research research methods revision revision strategy starting the PhD supervision Tate Summer School theory thesis time Uncategorized voice writing.

Blog at WordPress, the paper writing. Add your thoughts here optional Post to Cancel. Email Required Name Required Website. Send to Email Address Your Name Your Email Address. Post was not sent - check your email addresses! Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.

Papers \u0026 Essays: Crash Course Study Skills #9

, time: 9:00

Paper Writing Tips for the Busy Student – Colorado State University Online

If you’re presenting an analysis of information, then your paper is analytical. If you’re writing to explain information, then your paper is expository. If you’re arguing a conclusion, then it’s argumentative or persuasive. Your thesis statement should match the type of paper you’re writing This involves a shift from writing that tends to be formal and in depth (e.g., essays) to writing that is more informal, usually counts less toward the final grade, and is generally easier and quicker to mark (e.g., journals, online discussion groups) This is why the Writing Center and your instructors encourage you to start writing more than a day before the paper is due. If you write the paper the night before it’s due, you make it almost impossible to read the paper with a fresh eye. Try outlining after writing—after you have a draft, look at each paragraph separately